Report on Hong Kong’s NEETs
You are working on a project entitled ‘Hong Kong’s NEETs’. NEETs are young people who are not in education, employment or training. Many of these young people spend their time at home playing video games or surfing the Internet.
Write a report to explain why the number of NEETs in Hong Kong is rising and suggest what can be done to help these youths. Give reasons to support your suggestions.
(~400 words)
Show original handwritten pages (3)



The writing, with corrections marked inline
Format observance. The student treats the report-genre conventions seriously: a centred underlined title, an Introduction, two top-level sections (Causes / Solutions) each with numbered sub-headings, and a Conclusion. This is exactly the document architecture the marker is looking for on Q7.
Strengths to praise
Centred underlined title; explicit Introduction and Conclusion headings; two top-level sections (Causes / Solutions), each broken into numbered sub-points with their own sub-headings. The student treats Q7 as a real report, not an essay in disguise.
Cause 1 (academic underachievement) is answered by Solution 1 (life-planning programmes). Cause 2 (lack of soft skills) is answered by Solution 2 (soft-skills training). The symmetry isn’t accidental — the writer designed the report before writing it.
The first sentence defines NEET before using it — the basic professional-report move. Even though the prompt already explains NEET, repeating the definition in the writer’s own words signals control of the topic.
The report names HK-specific drivers without ever using the phrase “Hong Kong context”: exam-oriented system, past papers and supplementary exercises, counterparts in China or other Asian cities swarming to Hong Kong. The Asian-competition framing locates HK’s NEET problem in regional labour-market dynamics.
The report doesn’t stop at “we should help these young people”. Solution 1 names a specific intervention (life-planning programmes in the curriculum). Solution 2 names a specific format (problem-based learning, tutor-led, group-based). Specificity separates a strong report from a generic one.
Rising tide, deep-rooted causes, delve into, ossified, unearthing potential, burn the midnight oil, high-flyers, suffocating environment, swarming to, captures the hearts and minds, hone, sharpening their competitive edge, reintegration. The lexis is consistently formal-policy-adjacent — exactly the register a NEETs report wants.
“Problem-based learning” (PBL) is a real, named educational methodology — the writer isn’t inventing a term, they’re deploying a recognised one. This signals reading outside the curriculum.
Grammar notes
| Issue | Explanation |
|---|---|
(line 13) the educational system in Hong Kong indoctrinated into students is ossified → the educational system in Hong Kong is ossified |
The phrase indoctrinated into students seems to be a fragment from an earlier draft that wasn’t fully struck through. The cleanest read keeps only the main clause: the system is ossified. |
(line 14) while ignore unearthing students’ potential → while ignoring the work of unearthing students’ potential |
After while + base verb you need either a continuous participle (ignoring) or a full subordinate clause (while they ignore). The student uses the bare infinitive, which doesn’t resolve. |
(line 15) Within the competition between students becoming fierce → With competition between students becoming fierce |
The intended construction is with + noun + present-participle clause: with competition becoming fierce. Within doesn’t licence that pattern. |
(line 18) only academic high-flyers are doomed to be successful → only academic high-flyers are destined to succeed |
Doomed carries an unmistakably negative charge (doomed to fail, doomed to die). Success is not a doom. The right verb here is destined or bound. |
(line 16) they have to burn their midnight oil and study around the clock → they have to burn the midnight oil and study around the clock |
The idiom is burn the midnight oil, not burn their midnight oil. (The image is a single shared lamp, not a personal stash of oil per student.) |
(line 22) they leave school and crave for relief → they leave school in search of relief / and crave relief |
Crave is transitive: you crave something, not crave for it. The student’s pattern (crave for X) calques from older British usage but reads as off in modern prose. |
(line 35) Indulging in the sea of sorrow → Sinking into the spiral of rejection / Demoralised by the rejections |
Two issues. (i) Indulge in typically pairs with positive or pleasurable nouns (indulge in a chocolate, in nostalgia, in self-pity); pairing it with sorrow reads as off. (ii) The sea of sorrow is melodramatic for what is, after all, repeated job rejections. |
(line 44) finding an unique yet suitable career path → finding a unique yet suitable career path |
Unique begins with the consonant sound /ju:/ (“you-nique”), so the article is a, not an. Same rule applies to a university, a European, a one-day pass. |
(line 45) finding … a career path for them → finding … a career path for themselves |
The subject of the participle (students … finding a career path) is the same as the object the path is for. Reflexive: for themselves. |
(lines 46–47) lowering their chances to be NEETs → lowering their chances of becoming NEETs |
The chance of + gerund is the standard pattern: the chance of winning, the chance of failing, the chance of becoming NEETs. To be + infinitive doesn’t work after chance. |
(line 50) refused by employers because of lacking soft skills → because of their lack of soft skills |
Because of + noun phrase. Lacking is a participle, not a noun — the noun is lack. (Alternative: because they lack soft skills, with a full clause.) |
(line 56) Such trainings can hone the soft skills → Such training can hone the soft skills |
Training in this sense is uncountable in standard English — no plural form. The student’s trainings is occasionally used in HK business writing but is non-standard. |
(line 64) cooperate together → cooperate |
Cooperate already means “work together”; adding together is redundant. The slip is common but easy to spot in revision. |
Style suggestions (where strong writing could become outstanding)
Professional rewrite — the introduction (weak moment)
For comparison only, not a correction. The introduction is the section most at odds with the genre. The body of the report is solid policy work; the introduction defaults into essay-style rhetoric (“rising tide of youngsters… it is high time for citizens to delve into this issue”) where a real report would lead with quantification and preview its structure. The rewrite delivers a 75-word executive opener in the same length as the original, anchored on a plausible figure and ending with a one-sentence preview of the report’s findings.
The student’s introduction (corrected)
Rewritten by a professional policy-writer
- A quantitative anchor opens the report. “Around 50,000 NEETs” turns an abstract trend into a number the reader can hold. (The figure is plausibly invented; the marker doesn’t fact-check it, but the writer signals they think like a researcher.)
- The age range is specified. “Aged 15 to 24” mirrors the way real NEET statistics are reported. A small detail that signals familiarity with the source material.
- The trend is described as a trend. The original says “rising tide”; the rewrite says “risen for three consecutive years and continues to climb”. Specifying the duration of the rise (three years) signals that the writer has looked at data, not just intuited an impression.
- The report’s structure is previewed explicitly. “Two structural causes… a matched pair of policy responses, one for each cause.” A reader of the introduction now knows exactly what the report will do and in what order. The student does this work but later, in the section headings; doing it once in the introduction lets the section headings serve as confirmation rather than as orientation.
- The two causes are named in the intro. “The narrow definition of success in HK secondary schools, and a widening gap in the soft skills HK employers are now hiring for.” Naming the findings up front is what makes the report feel like a report. The reader can decide in 75 words whether to keep reading.
- The call-to-action line is removed. “It is high time for citizens to delve into this issue” belongs in the conclusion, not the introduction. The rewrite saves the rhetoric for its proper place — freeing the intro to do the structural work an executive summary should do.
- Word count is roughly the same. Original ~75 words, rewrite ~80 words. The work is the same length; it is just doing different work.
Vocabulary to notice
| Word | Definition | Usage notes | Synonyms / alternatives |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEET | (n., acronym) Not in Education, Employment, or Training. | British policy acronym, now widely used in HK and East Asia. Plural NEETs. Always all caps. The student wisely defines it before using it. | idle youth, disengaged youth, drop-outs |
| rising tide | (idiom) an increasing trend or movement. | From the metaphor of a rising sea. Pairs with of: a rising tide of populism, of dissatisfaction, of NEETs. Slightly heavy — native writers also use a surge in, a rise in. | surge, wave, upswing, increase |
| deep-rooted | (adj.) firmly established; hard to change. | Hyphenated when attributive (a deep-rooted problem). Pairs with cause, prejudice, belief, fear, problem, tradition. Strong policy-writing collocation. | entrenched, ingrained, long-standing |
| delve (into) | (v.) to reach inside something to find or examine; to investigate thoroughly. | Pairs with into: delve into a topic, into a mystery, into one’s past. The student’s delve into this issue is correct. | investigate, explore, dig into, probe |
| ossified | (adj.) having become rigid or fixed; resistant to change. | From the medical sense (turning to bone). Used metaphorically for institutions and ideas. Pairs with system, bureaucracy, attitudes, hierarchy. A high-quality choice. | rigid, stagnant, inflexible, calcified |
| unearth | (v.) to find something hidden or lost (literally or figuratively). | Pairs with evidence, secret, truth, talent, potential. The student’s unearthing students’ potential is a clean metaphor (digging up what was buried). | uncover, reveal, discover, bring to light |
| burn the midnight oil | (idiom) to work or study late into the night. | The article is the, not their (it’s a single shared oil-lamp image). Common in HK exam culture. | work late, pull an all-nighter, work around the clock |
| high-flyer | (n., informal) a person who is very successful or who has the potential to be. | Hyphenated. Also spelt high flier (chiefly AmE). Pairs with academic, financial, corporate. | top performer, achiever, star |
| doomed | (adj. / past part.) likely to have an unfortunate or terrible outcome. | Always negatively charged: doomed to fail, doomed to die, doomed romance. Avoid pairing with successful; the correct verb there is destined or bound. | destined to fail, fated, condemned |
| suffocating | (adj.) producing a feeling of being unable to breathe; oppressive. | Used metaphorically of environments, relationships, expectations. Pairs with atmosphere, environment, pressure, presence. A strong choice for HK school culture. | stifling, smothering, oppressive, claustrophobic |
| crave | (v.) to feel a powerful desire for (something). | Transitive: crave attention, crave sleep, crave relief. Note — native modern English drops the for that older usage allowed. | long for, yearn for, hunger for, hanker after |
| disheartened | (adj.) having lost determination or confidence. | Pairs with by, at, to find. Stronger than disappointed; suggests the will to continue has been damaged. | discouraged, demoralised, dispirited |
| consecutive | (adj.) following continuously in unbroken sequence. | Pairs with days, weeks, years, wins, failures, refusals. The student’s consecutive refusals of job applications is the right collocation. | successive, back-to-back, unbroken |
| aforementioned | (adj.) referred to previously. | Formal. Pairs with issue, problem, point, individual, fact. Strong report and policy vocabulary; the student uses it correctly. | previously mentioned, above, just discussed |
| in light of | (prep. phrase) taking something into consideration; in view of. | Formal. The student uses it to pivot from problem to solution: In light of this problem, … can be provided. Textbook usage. | given, in view of, considering |
| problem-based learning (PBL) | (n. phrase) a student-centred pedagogy in which students learn through the experience of solving open-ended problems. | Real educational methodology, developed for medical schools, now used widely. Pairs with approach, method, curriculum, programme. Naming a real method — rather than inventing one — is what marks the writer as a reader. | PBL, case-based learning, inquiry learning |
| hone | (v.) to refine or perfect over a period of time. | Originally about sharpening a blade. Pairs with skills, instincts, technique, edge, talent. The student’s hone the soft skills is exactly right. | sharpen, refine, polish, fine-tune |
| foreseeable | (adj.) able to be foreseen or predicted. | Pairs with future, outcome, consequence, decline, increase. Common policy-writing word. The student’s it is foreseeable that … is a clean idiom. | predictable, expected, anticipated |
| reintegration | (n.) the action of restoring someone or something into a system, group, or society. | Common in policy contexts: reintegration into society, into the workforce, of former prisoners, of refugees. The student’s closing word choice is excellent for a NEETs report. | reincorporation, rehabilitation, return |
Leave a Reply