Letter to the Editor — Egg Tarts & Mahjong as Cultural Heritage
Question prompt — Q5, Learning English through Popular Culture
Recently the Hong Kong Government published a list of intangible cultural heritage items that the city should protect. The following were on the list: Traditional egg tarts and Mahjong.
Write a letter to the editor of the Hong Kong Daily supporting the Government’s choice of these two features of Hong Kong culture, suggesting why they are worth protecting and how they can be protected.
(~400 words)
Show original handwritten pages (5)
The writing, with corrections marked inline
Legend:
red strikethrough = removed |
green highlight = added or replaced |
yellow highlight = handwriting unclear or wording almost certainly slipped
Booklet p.9 (lines 1–22)
1Dear Editor,
2
3Recently, the Hong Kong Government published a list of
4intangible cultural heritage items that the city should protect.
5Two items on the list echoed with resonated with me strongly: the most
6renowned egg tarts and mahjong. These two facets of Hong Kong
7culture contribute to the unique character of Hong Kong and it is
8important that they get well preserved. I would like to elaborate
9on the reasons why these features are worth protecting, and
10suggest some feasible ways in which we can present the list
11of these cultural treasures suggest some feasible ways in which we
12can preserve these cultural treasures.
13
14To begin with, egg tarts symbolise the unique food culture of
15Hong Kong. Hong Kong was once a British colony, and the local
16food culture eventually has gradually undergone absorbed changes in through
17the influx of Western culinary contacts influences. The resultant of a
18meaningful The result is a meaningful mix of the West and the East.
19Apart from egg tarts, a lot of other dishes also reflect the link
20between the West and the East, including milk tea, pineapple
21buns, and even fishballs. These took can only be found within the
22territory of Hong Kong, and the most widely-appreciated must be
Booklet p.10 (lines 23–46)
23the egg tart.
24
25Plenty of tourists visit Hong Kong just to have a try of taste the
26renowned cuisine, and trust I trust that this shows that local food
27culture and traditions play an important role of in representing the
28persona of our local food culture. Without egg tarts, the bright
29culture of Hong Kong may lose its glow and stature distinctive
30character. [Western and Eastern cultures] would not like be likely to
31experience blend. Therefore, it is important to protect traditional
32egg tarts.
33
34To protect and promote egg tarts, I suggest that the government
35should cooperate with local food stalls and jointly hold a large-
36scale food festival, where traditional egg tarts at and the most
37authentic local food suppliers will create egg tarts of their own
38taste and present them in the food festival. The locals will not
39only be reminded of the fading fading food culture when they try
40the tart that the event makes had retired in years — a flavour
41many have not encountered in years —, they will start to grow to
42love this traditional dessert of Hong Kong again, and be empowered
43to protect this kind of culture. At the same time, egg tarts can
44also be promoted to international tourists who will give spend
45their time in the food festival. They will learn more about the
46West and East East-West food culture of Hong Kong, and more
Booklet p.11 (lines 47–69)
47attraction will be drawn to the local cuisine of Hong Kong.
48
49On the other hand, mahjong is an entertainment device that have
50tradition that has been enjoyed for centuries and its significance
51contributes to the recreational life of Hong Kong people. Thrived
52Thriving in Hong Kong in the last century, a lot of exercises
53many elders played mahjong with their friends as a hobby. Today,
54mahjong is not only a game for entertainment, but also a platform
55where they could keep up with their latest local gossip. The
56importance of mahjong is also depicted in other ways. For
57instance, in the hotels, a long-winded of Japanese mob makes
58mahjong as the main theme, where they recall friends and so on
59several long-running Japanese dramas centre on mahjong as their
60main theme — a sign of how widely the game travels. Even if it
61was to play the same well-known music about [mahjong],
62Mahjong is undoubtedly recognised as one of the collective
63memories of Hong Kong. Yet its popularity is shaking waning,
64and it is necessary to revive it so that we do not lose this icon
65of entertainment in the last century.
66
67To cope with the decline of the mahjong trend, it is suggested
68that the government should hold a tennis-week ten-week mahjong
69competition for the citizens of Hong Kong. The reasons would be
Booklet p.12 (lines 70–91)
70that the fading popularity of mahjong is the size of entertainment
71which today’s locals more often resorting to partly because today’s
72locals more often turn to other forms of entertainment. They
73are seeking matching as find mahjong too time-consuming or too
74complex to play. So they gradually turn to technologic technological
75gadgets which last take less time. Likely together to the entirety
76To revive the appeal of mahjong, if a competition regarding on
77mahjong is held, perhaps a considerable number of citizens will
78again be once again be motivated to take part in this game. They
79will begin to pick up playing mahjong as a hobby again, with
80the ambition to achieve the title of athletes champions in the
81competition. In addition, since the competition does not involve
82gambling, younger citizens and even teenagers can participate.
83They will get the opportunity to learn the rules and skills of
84mahjong, and the pleasant tradition can therefore be passed to
85newer generations, avoiding risks of disappearing the risk of the
86game disappearing over time.
87
Supp. sheet S1 (lines 88–104) — conclusion
88To sum up, I support the Government’s choice of treating
89traditional egg tarts and mahjong as two of the most remarkable
90recognisable cultural heritage items. They should be protected as
91great representations of the unique culture of Hong Kong, and
92there are many reasons ways we can take to let them shine again.
93In fact, apart from egg tarts and mahjong, there are still plenty
94of cultural icons we should preserve. It is hoped that citizens
95will develop awareness in protecting the collective memories and
96symbols of the city.
97
98Yours faithfully,
99Chris Wong
Continuation onto a supplementary sheet. The letter runs out of space at the end of booklet page 12 (after the mahjong competition paragraph) and the conclusion finishes on Supplementary Answer Sheet A (S1, PDF page 31). The Question No. box on the supplementary sheet correctly shows Q5 ticked. The corrected version above stitches them together.
Length. The letter runs to roughly 650 words against a 400-word brief — over 60% above target. The architecture is genuinely impressive (four sub-tasks — two features × two sub-questions per feature — all addressed) but the prose has not been compressed; some paragraphs read as first-draft thinking.
Two paragraphs where the syntax collapses. (i) The food festival paragraph (lines 34–47) contains the run-on “traditional egg tarts at the most authentic local food suppliers will create egg tarts of their own taste… when they try the tart that the event makes had retired in years”. (ii) The mahjong-competition paragraph (lines 67–86) similarly tangles: “the fading popularity of mahjong is the size of entertainment which today’s locals more often resorting to. They are seeking matching as too time-consuming…” These are the two moments where the marker’s pen most likely came out.
One culturally unclear reference. “In the hotels, a long-winded of Japanese mob makes mahjong as the main theme, where they recall friends and so on” (lines 57–58) — this appears to be a confused reference to long-running Japanese dramas or anime that feature mahjong (e.g., Akagi, Mahjong Hourouki). Marked unclear; the corrected version above proposes a clean replacement.
Sign-off. Yours faithfully is the correct close for a letter to the editor where the addressee is “Dear Editor” rather than a named person. The student gets this right.
Length. The letter runs to roughly 650 words against a 400-word brief — over 60% above target. The architecture is genuinely impressive (four sub-tasks — two features × two sub-questions per feature — all addressed) but the prose has not been compressed; some paragraphs read as first-draft thinking.
Two paragraphs where the syntax collapses. (i) The food festival paragraph (lines 34–47) contains the run-on “traditional egg tarts at the most authentic local food suppliers will create egg tarts of their own taste… when they try the tart that the event makes had retired in years”. (ii) The mahjong-competition paragraph (lines 67–86) similarly tangles: “the fading popularity of mahjong is the size of entertainment which today’s locals more often resorting to. They are seeking matching as too time-consuming…” These are the two moments where the marker’s pen most likely came out.
One culturally unclear reference. “In the hotels, a long-winded of Japanese mob makes mahjong as the main theme, where they recall friends and so on” (lines 57–58) — this appears to be a confused reference to long-running Japanese dramas or anime that feature mahjong (e.g., Akagi, Mahjong Hourouki). Marked unclear; the corrected version above proposes a clean replacement.
Sign-off. Yours faithfully is the correct close for a letter to the editor where the addressee is “Dear Editor” rather than a named person. The student gets this right.
Strengths to praise
1. The four sub-tasks are all addressed — this is the marks-getter
Q5 has a hidden four-part structure: (a) which two features, (b) why each is worth protecting, (c) how each can be protected, plus (d) a frame for both. Many candidates handle one feature properly and pad the other. This letter handles both features in symmetrical depth — egg tarts get a cultural-fusion reason and a food-festival method; mahjong gets a collective-memory reason and a ten-week competition method. The symmetry is what 19/21 looks like.
2. East-West fusion as the analytical lens for egg tarts
Rather than just saying “egg tarts are tasty”, the writer frames the dish as evidence of Hong Kong’s colonial-era culinary fusion: “Hong Kong was once a British colony, and the local food culture has gradually absorbed changes through the influx of Western culinary influences. The result is a meaningful mix of the West and the East.” (lines 15–18). The writer then strengthens the case by listing parallel hybrid foods (milk tea, pineapple buns, fishballs). This is graduate-level cultural framing for a 17-year-old.
3. Real engagement with the “intangible cultural heritage” concept
The letter doesn’t just use the prompt’s phrase as a label. The writer treats the items as practices (a way of eating, a way of socialising) rather than as objects, and the protection methods reflect that — you protect a practice by reviving its use, not by putting it in a museum. The food festival and the open competition both invite participation, which is what UNESCO-style intangible heritage protection actually looks like.
4. Specific, implementable protection methods
The letter doesn’t stop at “we should protect them”. It proposes concrete operations: a large-scale food festival with local food stalls cooperating to display authentic recipes, and a ten-week mahjong competition open to citizens including teenagers, structured so that gambling is excluded. Specificity is what separates a 5* opinion piece from a 5** policy letter.
5. The intergenerational angle for mahjong is well argued
The competition idea isn’t just a competition — the writer names why it would work: “since the competition does not involve gambling, younger citizens and even teenagers can participate. They will get the opportunity to learn the rules and skills of mahjong, and the tradition can therefore be passed to newer generations.” (lines 81–85). Naming the mechanism (no gambling → legal for minors → intergenerational transmission) is real argumentative work.
6. Mature vocabulary deployed in natural collocations
Intangible cultural heritage, renowned, persona, facets, resonated, influx, culinary influences, collective memory, recreational life, alienated, undoubtedly recognised, fading popularity, motivated to take part, passed to newer generations, cultural icons, develop awareness — all used in their proper habitat. The register is steadily formal throughout.
7. The conclusion broadens the argument productively
“In fact, apart from egg tarts and mahjong, there are still plenty of cultural icons we should preserve. It is hoped that citizens will develop awareness in protecting the collective memories and symbols of the city.” (lines 93–96). The letter closes by inviting the reader to think beyond the two named items — turning a specific case for two items into a general call to action. This is exactly what an op-ed-style letter to the editor should do at its close.
Grammar notes
| Issue | Explanation |
|---|---|
(line 5) Two items on the list echoed with me strongly → resonated with me strongly |
Echo describes a sound bouncing back; the verb the writer wants is resonate, which is the standard idiom for ideas or images that strike a chord. Resonate with is the fixed phrase. |
(lines 16–17) the local food culture eventually undergone changes in the influx of Western culinary contacts → has gradually absorbed changes through the influx of Western culinary influences |
Three issues. (i) Eventually undergone is missing an auxiliary — needs has eventually undergone, or rephrase. (ii) In the influx → through or during the influx. (iii) Culinary contacts is the wrong noun — the writer means influences, traditions, techniques. |
(lines 17–18) The resultant of a meaningful mix → The result is a meaningful mix |
The resultant is an adjective used attributively (the resultant force, the resultant decision). It cannot stand as a noun on its own here. The writer wants the noun result. |
(line 19) a lot of other dishes were quite distinct of the link between the West and the East → also reflect the link between the West and the East |
The original phrasing doesn’t resolve. Distinct of isn’t an English collocation (one is distinct from). The simplest fix is to replace the whole clause: the writer means these dishes are further examples of the East-West fusion. |
(line 21) These took only found within the territory of Hong Kong → These can only be found within the territory of Hong Kong |
Tense/auxiliary slip — took appears to be a pen slip for can. The sentence needs the passive can be found. |
(line 25) tourists visit Hong Kong just to have a try of the renowned cuisine → just to taste the renowned cuisine / just to try the renowned cuisine |
Have a try of is not idiomatic English. Either use the verb taste / try directly, or the noun phrase have a taste of. |
(line 27) play an important role of representing → play an important role in representing |
The collocation is play a role in X, never play a role of X. Reliable pattern: play a role in shaping, in promoting, in representing, in determining. |
(lines 49–50) mahjong is an entertainment device that have enjoyed for centuries → an entertainment tradition that has been enjoyed for centuries |
Three issues. (i) Entertainment device describes hardware (a TV, a console); mahjong is a tradition / pastime / game. (ii) Subject-verb agreement — the antecedent is singular. (iii) The verb needs the passive (has been enjoyed), since mahjong is the object of enjoyment, not the enjoyer. |
(lines 51–53) Thrived in Hong Kong in the last century, a lot of exercises played mahjong → Thriving in Hong Kong in the last century, many elders played mahjong |
Thrived as a participle should be thriving. Exercises is clearly a pen slip for elders (or elderly people, the elderly) — exercise means a workout or a task, not a person. |
(line 63) its popularity is shaking → its popularity is waning |
Shaking describes physical tremor; the writer wants waning, declining, fading, dropping off. Waning is the most idiomatic for declining popularity. |
(line 68) a tennis-week mahjong competition → a ten-week mahjong competition |
Pen slip — tennis for ten. The hyphenated ten-week is the standard form for duration adjectives. |
(line 74) technologic gadgets → technological gadgets |
Technologic is a non-standard form — modern English uses technological (adj.) almost exclusively. |
(line 75) technological gadgets which last less time → which take less time |
Last here means “endure / continue to exist”; that is the opposite of what the writer means. Take less time describes how long an activity lasts, which is the intended sense. |
(line 84) the pleasant can therefore be passed to newer generations → the tradition can therefore be passed to newer generations |
Pleasant is an adjective, not a noun. The writer wants the tradition, the practice, the game, the love of the game. |
(lines 89–90) two of the most remarkable cultural heritage items → two of the most recognisable cultural heritage items |
Remarkable means “worthy of remark”, which is true but vague. Recognisable is the precise word — egg tarts and mahjong are heritage items every Hong Konger would identify on sight. |
Style suggestions (where strong writing could become outstanding)
Categories:
Fluency sentence flow, collocations, rhythm.
Authenticity places that sound student-y or translated; how a native voice would say it.
Text-type fit matching the conventions of the genre — here, a published letter to the editor of a daily newspaper.
Suggestion 1 · the opening could name the policy occasion more concretely
Text-type fit
lines 3–6
Original: “Recently, the Hong Kong Government published a list of intangible cultural heritage items that the city should protect. Two items on the list resonated with me strongly: the most renowned egg tarts and mahjong.”
Try: “The Government’s recently published list of intangible cultural heritage items deserves both applause and a closer look. Of the items chosen, two stand out for the work they still have to do in modern Hong Kong — the egg tart and the mahjong table.”
A letter to the editor competes for attention with the rest of the page. The original opens with three throat-clearing words (Recently) and reaches the writer’s position only in sentence two. The rewrite folds the policy occasion, the writer’s stance, and the two named items into one tight pair of sentences, and turns “egg tarts and mahjong” into the more evocative singulars the egg tart and the mahjong table.
Suggestion 2 · the East-West fusion paragraph is your best argument — protect its rhythm
Fluency
lines 15–21
Original: “Hong Kong was once a British colony, and the local food culture eventually undergone changes in the influx of Western culinary contacts. The resultant of a meaningful mix of the West and the East. Apart from egg tarts, a lot of other dishes were quite distinct of the link between the West and the East, including milk tea, pineapple buns, and even fishballs.”
Try: “Hong Kong cuisine is, at heart, a record of contact. A British colony for a century and a half, the city absorbed Western techniques into its own kitchens. The egg tart — flaky pastry around a Cantonese custard — is the sweetest example, but milk tea, pineapple buns and even fishballs tell the same story.”
The original idea is brilliant but the syntax stutters in three places (eventually undergone, the resultant of, distinct of). Rewriting the paragraph in clean sentences lets the analytical move — fusion as the lens for HK food — carry the weight it deserves. The new image (flaky pastry around a Cantonese custard) also concretises the fusion claim in one phrase.
Suggestion 3 · replace “the persona of our local food culture”
Authenticity
lines 27–28
Original: “…traditions play an important role in representing the persona of our local food culture.”
Try: “…traditions are central to the city’s culinary identity.”
Persona is the mask an actor wears, or a deliberately projected public character — it implies performance. A food culture has character or identity, not a persona. The student is reaching for the right concept but landing on the wrong word.
Suggestion 4 · the food-festival paragraph runs on — break the sentence
Fluency
lines 34–47
Original: “…jointly hold a large-scale food festival, where traditional egg tarts at the most authentic local food suppliers will create egg tarts of their own taste and present them in the food festival. The locals will not only be reminded of the fading food culture when they try the tart that the event makes had retired in years…”
Try: “…jointly hold a large-scale food festival. Each participating stall would showcase its house recipe — the variations on the egg tart that have quietly disappeared from most bakeries. For locals, the festival would reintroduce flavours they grew up with but no longer encounter; for tourists, it would offer the kind of food story no guidebook can reproduce.”
The original tries to do five things in one sentence and ends up doing none of them clearly. The rewrite splits the idea into three: the operational format, what locals get, what tourists get. Each idea earns a clean clause.
Suggestion 5 · the Japanese-drama reference needs to land or come out
Authenticity
lines 56–60
Original: “For instance, in the hotels, a long-winded of Japanese mob makes mahjong as the main theme, where they recall friends and so on.”
Try: “The cultural reach of mahjong extends well beyond Hong Kong: several long-running Japanese dramas use the game as their central setting (Akagi, Mahjong Hourouki), and Western board-game cafes increasingly stock a Riichi set.”
The original is the most opaque sentence in the letter — the marker would have stopped here. If the writer is reaching for a specific cultural reference (a Japanese anime/drama about mahjong), name it. If the reference can’t be retrieved under exam pressure, cut the sentence entirely; a vague gesture at “hotels” and “Japanese mob” weakens the argument more than it strengthens it.
Suggestion 6 · reframe “waning popularity” in terms of who isn’t playing
Text-type fit
lines 63–65
Original: “Yet its popularity is waning, and it is necessary to revive it so that we do not lose this icon of entertainment in the last century.”
Try: “But the game is now played mostly by people in their seventies and above. A generation that never learned it is a generation away from losing it altogether.”
A letter to the editor wants its claims grounded in a fact the reader can picture. Popularity is waning is abstract; played mostly by people in their seventies and above is something the reader has noticed themselves. Specificity earns the reader’s trust.
Suggestion 7 · the competition paragraph collapses syntactically — restart the sentence
Fluency
lines 69–75
Original: “The reasons would be that the fading popularity of mahjong is the size of entertainment which today’s locals more often resorting to. They are seeking matching as too time-consuming or too complex to play.”
Try: “The reason for the decline is no mystery: locals now reach for entertainment that fits between meetings — phone games, short-form video. Mahjong, by comparison, looks both slow and intimidatingly complex.”
Two sentences’ worth of confusion can almost always be fixed by rewriting from scratch rather than by patching. The rewrite names the alternative (phone games, short-form video) and turns the abstract fading popularity into a believable mechanism (looks slow and intimidatingly complex).
Suggestion 8 · the no-gambling clause is the strongest line in the competition argument — promote it
Text-type fit
lines 81–86
Original: “In addition, since the competition does not involve gambling, younger citizens and even teenagers can participate. They will get the opportunity to learn the rules and skills of mahjong, and the tradition can therefore be passed to newer generations…”
Try: “Critically, no money would change hands. That single rule unlocks the under-18 audience — the generation that needs to learn the game if the game is to outlive its current players.”
The student names the right insight (no gambling → legal for minors → cultural transmission) but buries it as a sub-clause. Promoting it into its own short paragraph with a punchy verb (unlocks) gives the argument the bite it deserves.
Suggestion 9 · the closing’s broadening move is great — make the “other icons” line specific
Text-type fit
lines 93–96
Original: “In fact, apart from egg tarts and mahjong, there are still plenty of cultural icons we should preserve. It is hoped that citizens will develop awareness in protecting the collective memories and symbols of the city.”
Try: “The list could be longer. Cha chaan teng menus, neon shop signs, dim sum trolley calls, the wet market itself — each is fading at its own pace, and each will be missed only once it’s gone.”
A letter to the editor closes hardest when it leaves the reader with one more image to argue with. The original closes with a general appeal (develop awareness); the rewrite turns the gesture into four named candidates the reader can react to. Specificity in the close is what makes an op-ed letter quotable.
Professional rewrite — the food festival paragraph (weak moment)
Professional rewrite — cleaning up the collapsed festival paragraph
For comparison only, not a correction. The food festival paragraph carries the letter’s most important policy idea — concrete protection through revival of authentic recipes — but the syntax breaks in three places and the paragraph tries to do five things in one sentence. The rewrite splits the paragraph into the operation, the locals’ benefit, and the tourists’ benefit, each given its own clause, and grounds the abstract “fading food culture” in three specific lost variations of the egg tart.
The student’s festival paragraph (corrected)
To protect and promote egg tarts, I suggest that the government should cooperate with local food stalls and jointly hold a large-scale food festival, where traditional egg tarts and the most authentic local food suppliers will create egg tarts of their own taste and present them in the food festival. The locals will not only be reminded of the fading food culture when they try the tart — a flavour many have not encountered in years —, they will start to love this traditional dessert of Hong Kong again, and be empowered to protect this kind of culture. At the same time, egg tarts can also be promoted to international tourists who will spend their time in the food festival. They will learn more about the East-West food culture of Hong Kong, and more attraction will be drawn to the local cuisine of Hong Kong.
Rewritten by a professional opinion-writer
To protect and promote the egg tart, the government should partner with the city’s remaining traditional bakeries and cha chaan teng to host an annual Egg Tart Festival in the heart of Central. The organising principle would be simple: each participating shop showcases its own house recipe, including the variations that have quietly disappeared from chain bakeries — the Macanese flaky version, the firmer Cantonese custard, the cocktail-bun crust that once filled a corner of every neighbourhood. For Hong Kongers, the festival would reintroduce flavours most of us have not encountered in years and reopen the question of which version we grew up with. For visiting tourists, it would offer something no guidebook can manufacture: a food story told by the people who still make the food. Each participating shop should be invited to publish its recipe at the end of the festival — which would seed the next generation of bakers.
What the rewrite is doing differently:
- The festival has a name and a place. “An annual Egg Tart Festival in the heart of Central” is something a reader can picture. The original’s “large-scale food festival” stays abstract.
- The partners are named in HK-specific terms. “The city’s remaining traditional bakeries and cha chaan teng” rather than the generic “local food stalls”. Mentioning that the partners are remaining also quietly reinforces the heritage-at-risk argument.
- The “fading culture” claim becomes concrete. The student says traditions are fading. The rewrite names three lost variations — the Macanese flaky version, the firmer Cantonese custard, the cocktail-bun crust. Specificity turns a general lament into something the reader can grieve.
- The two audiences are separated cleanly. The original tangles locals and tourists in one sentence; the rewrite gives each its own clause with its own benefit. The locals get flavours most of us have not encountered in years; the tourists get a food story told by the people who still make the food.
- The locals’ benefit is phrased in the first person plural. “Most of us have not encountered in years… which version we grew up with” — in a letter to a HK newspaper, writing as a Hong Konger to other Hong Kongers is what makes the appeal land. The original keeps the locals at arm’s length (“the locals will…”) as if from outside.
- The tourists’ benefit is reframed as authenticity, not awareness. The original promises tourists will “learn more about” the food culture. The rewrite promises “a food story told by the people who still make the food” — which is what a tourist actually values, and which only a real festival can provide.
- A genuine transmission mechanism is added at the close. “Each participating shop should be invited to publish its recipe at the end of the festival — which would seed the next generation of bakers.” The original ends the festival idea with attraction-marketing language. The rewrite ends it with the heritage-protection mechanism the paragraph has been promising: a way for a recipe that lives in one bakery’s head to outlive that bakery.
Vocabulary to notice
| Word | Definition | Usage notes | Synonyms / alternatives |
|---|---|---|---|
| intangible cultural heritage | (n. phrase) traditions, oral histories, social practices, and craft skills that cultures recognise as part of their heritage. | A UNESCO term, adopted into HK policy language. Distinct from tangible heritage (buildings, objects). Pairs with protect, preserve, safeguard, register, transmit. | living heritage, cultural tradition, ICH (abbreviation) |
| resonate (with) | (v.) to evoke or suggest images, memories, or emotions; to have particular significance for someone. | Pairs with strongly, deeply, particularly. The fixed phrase resonate with is the right idiom for “strike a chord with”. The student uses echo; resonate is what is meant. | strike a chord with, mean a lot to, register with |
| renowned | (adj.) known and admired by many people. | Pairs with chef, restaurant, dish, building, scholar. Slightly more formal than famous; carries a positive evaluative charge that famous doesn’t. | famous, celebrated, well-known, acclaimed |
| facet | (n.) one side of something many-sided; one aspect of a topic or character. | Originally jewellery (the flat faces of a cut gemstone), now general. Pairs with important, complex, hidden, unexpected. The student’s facets of Hong Kong culture is exactly right. | aspect, dimension, side, feature, element |
| colony | (n.) a country or area under the political control of another country, usually a distant one. | Historical and political vocabulary. HK was a British colony from 1842 to 1997. Pairs with former, British, French, settler. Important counterpart: colonialism, colonial period. | territory, possession, dependency |
| influx | (n.) an arrival or entry of large numbers of people or things. | Pairs with of: an influx of tourists, of capital, of refugees, of culinary influences. The student’s influx of Western culinary influences is the right collocation (with the right preposition fix). | inflow, arrival, surge, wave |
| culinary | (adj.) relating to cooking or the kitchen. | Pairs with tradition, skill, art, history, school. Slightly formal — common in food journalism and culture writing. | cooking, gastronomic, food-related |
| cuisine | (n.) a style or method of cooking, especially as characteristic of a particular country, region, or establishment. | Pairs with local, regional, French, Cantonese, fusion, authentic. Singular even when discussing a broad tradition (Hong Kong cuisine, not cuisines). | cooking, food, fare, gastronomy |
| collective memory | (n. phrase) the shared memory of a group of people, often passed from one generation to the next. | A sociological / cultural-studies term. Pairs with preserve, lose, evoke, build, fade, transmit. Common in heritage and post-colonial writing about HK. | shared memory, cultural memory, public memory |
| recreational | (adj.) relating to or denoting activity done for enjoyment when one is not working. | Pairs with activity, drug, sport, vehicle, life, time. The student’s recreational life of Hong Kong people is a clean collocation. | leisure, free-time, pastime |
| wane | (v.) to decrease in vigour, power, or extent. | Originally the moon — the waning moon. Now common for popularity, influence, interest, enthusiasm: waning popularity, waning support. The student uses shaking where waning is needed. | decline, fade, diminish, dwindle |
| revive | (v.) to restore to life, consciousness, or use; to renew interest in something. | Pairs with tradition, interest, custom, language, fortunes. Revive a custom is a perfectly idiomatic phrase in heritage writing. | resurrect, renew, restore, bring back, resuscitate |
| icon | (n.) a person or thing regarded as a representative symbol of something. | Originally religious painting; broadened to cultural symbol. Pairs with cultural, national, fashion, pop. The student’s cultural icons is well used. | symbol, emblem, representation, totem |
| depict | (v.) to represent by drawing, painting, or other artistic means; to describe in detail. | Pairs with scene, character, life, event, theme. The student’s the importance of mahjong is also depicted in other ways stretches the verb slightly — shown, demonstrated, reflected would fit better, since “importance” isn’t typically depicted. | portray, show, illustrate, represent |
| authentic | (adj.) of undisputed origin; genuine. | Pairs with experience, recipe, tradition, voice, story. Heavily used in food writing — an authentic egg tart, an authentic Cantonese restaurant. | genuine, real, true, unfiltered, original |
| empower | (v.) to give someone the authority or power to do something; to make stronger and more confident. | Slightly buzz-wordy in modern English; use sparingly. Pairs with communities, women, workers, citizens, generations. The student’s empowered to protect this kind of culture is on-register for the heritage context. | enable, equip, authorise, embolden |
| generations to come | (n. phrase) future generations. | Set phrase. The student’s passed to newer generations is similar but slightly off — the more natural idiom is passed on to future generations or passed down to the next generation. | future generations, posterity, those who come after |
| awareness | (n.) knowledge or perception of a situation or fact. | Pairs with raise, develop, increase, public, growing, lack of. The student’s develop awareness works but the more common collocation in policy writing is raise awareness. | consciousness, knowledge, recognition, understanding |
Leave a Reply